PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:06:44 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Yes, 75, say, is better than 60.  In fact, at 60Hz, your monitor would just
about give you a migraine.

With the basic monitors and simple gfx cards I've had in the past, adjusting
the refresh to 72Hz has usually been sufficient to produce a viewable
picture.

Now, modern monitors and state-of-the-art gfx cards can produce refresh
rates far in excess of that.  However, I don't know if there's any point in
upping the ref rate past the point where it's comfortably viewed.

Ian Porter
Computer Guys
Arrowtown
New Zealand
[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Hurst" > My monitor supports several fifferent refresh rates at
the same resolution.....
> In refresh rates, is more better.. ??
>
> thanks
>
> David Hurst

            Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                   http://freepctech.com/pcbuild.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2