PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Apr 1999 12:11:04 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On 1 Apr 99, at 19:22, J Rapier wrote:

> What are the limitations of a Celeron/400 vs a PentiumII/400?

  PII-400 has 512K L2 cache running at 200 MHz.
  Celeron-400 has 128K L2 cache running at 400 MHz.
    Experience to date seems to suggest that smaller-faster cache is
    often better.

  PII-400 is 4.0x100.
  Celeron-400 is 6.0x66.
    Memory accesses not handled by cache will be faster on PII.

  PII is SMP-enabled.
  Celeron is SMP-capable, with surgery (not recommended for business)
    Not relevant with the board you've selected, but helps explain the
    price difference.


David G

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/staff.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2