PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lance Cummings <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 1 Mar 1998 13:43:02 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Bill, you seem well-versed on this subject, so perhaps you can tell
me if the ability of ultra to double the clock rate means that ultra
would probably support higher bus speeds . . . such as 75 mhz or
83 mhz.

Thanks,

Lance

On Sat, 28 Feb 1998 23:11:00 -0500, Bill Cohane <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

<snip>

> In wide SCSI, two bytes is sent along 16 data wires that are in parallel.
> For each clock cycle, two bytes can be transferred. So the data transfer
> rate is doubled in wide SCSI by doubling the width of the data path
> (doubling the number of data lines). There are also more ground wires (for
> shielding) and more control lines. With wide SCSI, twice as many SCSI devices
> can be handled by adding another "addressing" bit. Yes, the cable is wider
> for wide SCSI. (68 lines compared to 50.)
>
> Note that in *ultra* SCSI, the data transfer rate is doubled by doubling
> the clock rate. (Twice as many signals moving along each line each second.)
> Wide and ultra would give four times the data transfer capability of narrow
> (non ultra) SCSI.
>
> Regards,
> Bill
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2