PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stanislav Rabinovich <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 01:55:44 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Hi Ethan Matthews!   At 09:35 AM 7/29/01 -0500 you wrote:
 >On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:53:18 +1000, Ultra <[log in to unmask]> posted article
 ><003a01c116a3$7deed910$50fa36cb@Master>, which said:
 >
 >> win2k should be a better platform for video editing (no 2G file size
 >> limit as win9x does).
 >
 >Ahhh, that explains why I can't edit 2.1 gigabyte video clips!  I had no
 >idea Win98 had a limit on file size. :-)  Incidentally, I could PLAY the raw
 >AVI video clip with Windows Media Player, but when I tried to edit and save
 >the file, I got errors on anything over 2 gigs.  I wonder why I could play
 >the file, but not edit it, and how was my video capture card "allowed" to
 >write such a large file in the first place?

You can save this file! if it is mpeg1.
You can do that, using tmpg encoder and reducing the  bitrating a little .
But it will work a long time (around 3 hours on 1GHz computer).
This is just what I did yesterday <g>.


--
Stanislav Rabinovich

                         PCBUILD's List Owners:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2