I have used several Seagate UDMAs recently, with very good results. The only
drawback I have had with Seagates is they are not as receptive to
overclocking the bus. Any warranty work I have done for customers over the
past three years has been handled with minimal problems. But the drive I
really have found to be the best in all regards is Maxtor. The No-Quibble
Warranty program is excellent. The drive is a great performer and very
receptive to overclocking. The drives are very quick and one of the best
performers I have used. I would prefer them over WD and Seagate and could
not fully comment on IBM.....

David Olds

> Uzi Paz wrote:
>
> > Now as to choosing the hard disk, I would go with typical UDMA hard
> > disks 8.4 Gb, the faster ones (66Mhz) are too expensive for this
> > purchase). In the past Seagate got bad reputation, and I could say that
I
> > would go only with IBM or WD, but I'm not sure that this is still valid.
> > I can now choose between Seagate and WD, and initially I tend to go
> > with WD, but wish to hear few more views.
>
>          PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
>                      visit our download web page at:
>                      http://nospin.com/pc/files.html

         PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
                     visit our download web page at:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/files.html