PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
johnfarrow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Dec 1998 22:58:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
> Then again, on this very list I have heard other people warn about the earlier
> Celeron's.  I believe they only have a limited amount of on-board cache (maybe
> 32K but I don't remember), while the PII's have 512K on-board.  I have heard
> good things about the AMD chip (K6's), but I have no experience with them.

Eric,
  The Celeron 266 and the 300 did not have ANY cache, however the 300(A)
and the 333 had 128k of level II Cache that ran at the SAME SPEED as the
processor, not at 1/2 the speed like the Pentium II's.  So the 333MHZ
Celeron does indeed run at pretty good clip.  Much thanks for the info
on your Father's system.

John


> Overall, the Compaq is a good value for the money.  The amount of software
> included was impressive and the package was put together with quality in mind.
> My Father somehow managed to get the 5050 with a 17" monitor (digital),
> flat-bed scanner, color printer (a good one too!) for under $900.  It was a
> good choice for him and may be for you.
>
> Happy Hunting.
>
> Eric
>

               PCBUILD mailing list is brought to you by:
                            The NOSPIN Group
                            http://nospin.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2