PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Changhsu P. Liu" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 May 1999 11:04:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I think I have seen explanation before, but I don't remember the details.
I bought a 9.1GB drive and according to the specification it's 9.1GB
formatted. But, after I formatted it, it showed up as only around 8.5GB. Do
HD manufacturers use different scale system than most OSs (e.g., divided by
1000 instead of 1024 so their numbers are always bigger than the actual
number shown on our system)? Why do they continue to do that if I rember
the reason correctly? Similar to what they're required to do with Monitors
(i.e., advertise 17 inch monitor, actual viewing size = 15.9 inch). Should
HD manufacuturers be required to use 9.1GB formatted size, actual usable
size = 8.5GB???

Any explanations on this?


Thanks,


Changhsu Liu
[log in to unmask]

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2