PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Drew Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 May 1999 00:15:47 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
You probably didn't go wrong anywhere.  If you move the modules so that they
are in opposite sockets does the address (the 030A0510 number) change?  If
so, you can count on the memory being bad.  If the address doesn't change,
it may be the motherboard.

You might try lightly running a pencil eraser (the hard orange kind) across
the contacts of the DIMM to see if that removes any oxidization, if you
determine that the module is at fault.  Sometimes (although not very often)
that fixes the problem.

=d=

> -----Original Message-----
> From: PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jon Schwartz
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 2:18 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [PCBUILD] Memory conflict
>
>
> After installing two 32 meg sticks of 72-pin EDO RAM in addition to the
> existing two 16 megs sticks, I was delighted to see the following:
>
> "Memory address line failure at 030A0510, read F4F5F5F5 expecting
> F5F5F5F5.
>  Decreasing available memory"
>
> Total meg count should be 96 but the PC only recognizes 80.  I've swapped
> the sticks around in the slots with no improvement.  80 megs
> makes it quite
> snappy but I'm greedy for the full count.  Where did I go wrong?

        PCBUILD only works if you contribute. Send your messages
             to be posted to: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2