In my view it's one of Microsoft's best efforts. I'm running 10 on about 6
or so machines here, laptops, desktops, some new, some old by computer
standards. It runs fine.

Some folks wed themselves to various operating systems and resist upgrading.
So be it. Use what you like. Others of us are interested in innovation and
want the bleeding edge. Plus, Microsoft provided it for free. What's not to
like?

Less mature means what in this case? I've been running 10 for about 2 years
now.

Vincent Winterling
Vineland, NJ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Personal Computer Hardware discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Eisenstadt
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 9:50 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Windows 10 update
>
> I am writing to ask the experts why they are upgrading to Win 10 at all.
>
> I am running Win 7 32bit and it is very stable.  Why move to a less mature
> OS from a known reliable OS? I must be missing something here so that
> is why I am asking.
>
> Michael Eisenstadt
>
> On 8/3/2016 8:15 PM, Peter Shkabara wrote:
> > This is an update to my Win 10 update disaster. I "fixed" my immediate
> > problem by rolling back to my previous version of Windows and all is
running
> > ok now. Still, it raises the question of how to do an individual file
> > restore from a Windows backup in Win 10. Also note that some programs do
not
> > run under the newly released version of Win 10 (Version 1601 I think). I
am
> > now back to version 1511 and thing seem fine for now.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any comments or recommendations for a system disk backup utility will be
> > appreciated. I did use Acronis, but the earlier versions don't run on
Win 10
> > and found the new version a rather poor design.
> >
> >
> >
> > Peter Shkabara

                          PCSOFT's List Owners:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Mark Rode<[log in to unmask]>