PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 14:50:46 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On 14 Feb 99, at 21:10, TracyTaulman wrote:

>   Has anyone ever seen a Intel 233MMX report itself as a 133MMX?  I
> have tried the chip in two different systems and they both show it as
> a 133 MMX in the boot sequence.  The chip is in a Biostar motherboard
> and is about 10 months old.  I have put a P200MMX in the same
> motherboard and it reports it as a P200MMX so I think the motherboard
> is fine.  The system I took the P200MMX out of reports the 233MMX as
> a 133MMX.  Also the markings on the CPU indicate that it is in fact
> an Intel 233 MMX. Any thoughts?

  You may have BIOSes that pre-date the introduction of the 233 MHz
part, and thus do not correctly recognize it.

David G

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2