I suppose to say that I disagreed with the theory was wrong. What I should
have said is that I think that it is unlikely. I don't have any arguments to
put up against the theory being possible.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Cales [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>That is a very interesting theory indeed.  Which parts of it give you
>trouble?  it seems to answer several key issues of human development and
>nutritional desires.