PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jan 1999 17:55:02 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Geoffrey Stanford wrote:

> geoff here:  there is a difference in sugars:  most fruits have fructose,
> but cane and beet have sucrose.  can anyone expert tell us more about this
> difference?  which has maple?

Fructose and glucose are monosaccharides; sucrose is a
disaccharide, which is composed of one molecule of each.  Fruits
may contain any or all three of these sugars, in different
proportions.  An orange, for example, contains 5.5g of sucrose,
3.3g fructose, and 2.9g glucose.  Since the sucrose will be
broken down into equal amounts of fructose and glucose (by the
sucrase enzyme) the net result will be slightly more fructose
than glucose.

I mention this to correct a common misconception that fruits
contain *only* fructose.  I don't know about maple sugar.
Lactose is another disaccharide consisting of glucose plus
galactose, which are separated by the enzyme lactase, which many
people do not retain into adulthood, or can only produce limited
amounts of.

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2