PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
tsayonah <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:41:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Theola wrote:

> Humans have been tinkering with food for a long time, but maybe some of the
> heirloom seed varieties/old cultivars available today have more value than
> nostalgia.

I came across a discussion several years ago (can't remember
much about it) that claimed there are differences in
life-giving value between "live" and "dead" foodstuffs.  As
I remember, the basic premise was that the closer to the
live state you consumed the food, the more the nutritional
value.  This spring while planting I got to wondering if
there is any difference between the values in today's
"engineered" varieties and the heirloom varieties.  Does
anyone have any info on whether a "BigBoy" tomato grown
organically (as possible) differs in any way from one grown
the same way but from a heirloom seed?  Thanks.
--
   Elisi Tsayonah, AniWodi, ghigau,
   St Francis River Band of Cherokee
          _,-.    ,-._
         {ooO }  { Ooo}
         ((_) )  ( (_))
          "~~"    "~~"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2