In a message dated 11/28/1999 11:30:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< I think it is a sad thing that GI tables don't include this kind of
 information, because of the risk of misinterpreting would be reduced. >>I
think the risk of misinterpreting is in the largest part due to the
misinterpreters and that inclusion of more rather than less information would
further obfiscate the matter of correct interpretation.