PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: "challenges" to evolution theory
From:
Ken Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Sep 2000 17:50:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:29:19 -0400, Philip Thrift
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 14:58:57 -0400, Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
>>ID is the claim that, given what we know
>>now, it is reasonable to infer design.  That's all.  Period.
>
>It is more reasonable, given that chemical and
>physical models are sufficient to provide theories for the
>origin of life, then no new *special* principle outside of these
>needs to be added.

Why?


--
Cheers,

Ken
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2