On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Swayze wrote:
> Again, once the fish has met that caloric threshold, other considerations
than caloric density come into play.

Todd> Okay, that makes sense.  Now how does that translate into support for
the claim that sweet potatoes or other tubers would have been a marginal
(i.e., non-preferred) food?

I do not know, Todd.  I can see arguments for each side, but for lack of
better evidence, I personally choose to exclude them right now.  Maybe I'll
try to work some in once I'm through trying to justify the "paleo-ness" of
Australian Shiraz  ;-)