PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phosphor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:31:39 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
----- Original Message -----
I has too many problems with protein toxicity (this includes calcium bone
> loss),

what do you mean here by protein toxicity?

it is low energy (because of little fat)

eat more of them. Howevr, i will resile from my statement that kangaroo is
an ideal paelo food. i would imagine emu and goanna would be better.

>
> I do subscribe to more modern explanations that appear more plausible to
me:
> The denser food items were tubers and nuts.
> They are better suited as brain food (glucose)

in the absence of dietary glucose the proteins are catabolised into glucose.
The brain also uses the amino acid glutamine and fatty acids for fuel.

Where are your tuber tribes that prove your point? Which paelo culture lived
predominantly on tubers? can't you name any?

Andrew

ATOM RSS1 RSS2