PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ingrid Bauer/Jean-Claude Catry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 May 2003 17:47:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
 Well, if these
> enzymes were really important in digesting food, wouldn't the plant digest
> itself?

Non sense.
breaking done of tissue is regulated in a living organism to maintain the
structure of that organism but as soon death occur an active process of
breaking down start ( that can be suspended by drying ,cooking ,salting or
other means that are used by the food industry ).
.
Ex the detachment of leaves from the branches in a deciduous tree in the
fall is an active process that involved enzymes . Kill a tree before and it
will not loose its leave .
Fruits are also via enzymatic activity reaching perfect ripened stage before
continuing the process toward decay.
Aging of meats involve also enzymes etc...

Nobody yet figured out the difference between a living organism and a dead
one ,same body , one is functionning and the other one not .  denying there
is a difference because of that is simply foolish.

In comparaison with the powerfull enzymes of digestive juices this process
of "natural decay " started by the food itself might not be of absolute
necessity in the avalability of nutrients resulted  but i would not say
either  that it isn't important .
jean-claude

ATOM RSS1 RSS2