PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Apr 1999 11:24:07 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
<<You have to think of the advertisers, they are paying the revenue and
the
salaries of all the journalists.>>

Hmm.. while an article that attacked name brands in particular might
catch some heat, I wouldn't be too quick to equate a bad article with
an editorial conspiracy. Vapidity is as vapidity does. I think there's
also an opinion that the average consumer can only handle so much depth
(not much!)... which I think is untrue. But try pitching a well-written
article with great examples to a publication with some reputation for
good reportage and see what happens!


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2