PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ken Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:18:40 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000 16:50:11 +0100, Hans Kylberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>At 08:57 2000-02-06 CST, Justin wrote:
>>in my opinion, if someone were to say 'Cows' milk is for baby cows
>>therefore it's unhealthy for human consumption' then I would disagree with
>>this.
>
>The paleodiet approach is: 'Cows' milk is for baby cows, wich does not say
>anything about that it should be safe for humans also, so to not risk
>anything, we avoid it.

No, again the wrong concept is being used.

The crucial wrong words are "is for".

Egg yolks are "for" baby chicks, but that doesn't stop us or many other
creatures from eating them.

The actual paleodiet concept is that the "technology of domestication"
(Neanderthin, page 48) is required to consume the milk of another species (in
any quantity worth analyzing).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2