PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Getty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:20:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
We are heading for 6 billion.  We've passed 5 billion last year.

P
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: What if Everyone Did It?


> >One issue that I've not seen discussed is the idea of whether and to what
> >degree
> >the paleo diet would be sustainable if all the people on this planet
> >decided to
> >follow it.  I know that it takes something like ten to twenty times more
land
> >for a hunter gatherer than for a farmer.
>
> I'm not sure about that statistic.  But also, H-G's can live on land that
> is unsuitable for agriculture, so there's a lot more acreage available.
>
> But there's another solution, which for some reason no one talks
> about.  Who says we need 3 billion people?  ALL of our environmental
> problems would be much easier to solve if there weren't so many of us.  --
> and hey, I am NOT advocating mass killing or starvation!  All that's
> necessary is a slight reduction in the average children-per-family. Well,
> okay:  in some countries, it might be a fairly large reduction.
> Any of you who've read the "Ishmael" books are familiar with some other
> ideas related to this.  It may turn out to be the ultimate solution, in
the
> sense that if we don't do that, nothing else will really help.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2