Sheryl wrote:

>I never tire of reexamining principles.  I think this is always worthwhile.
>Many so-called "facts" have turned out to be wrong in light of later
>findings.

That would be fine, if we were debating scholarly findings.  But to have to
continually justify the basic principles of paleo eating, when this is by
definition a paleo eating *support* list, is wearying in the extreme.

>I do tire of a nasty, arrogant, and obnoxious communication style.
>  I wish Wally would go haunt some other list.  Personally, I don't care what
>he has to say if this is the way he chooses to say it.  I won't respond to
>someone who speaks to me in this manner, and I wish others didn't respond to
>him either.  Maybe then he'd go away.

I value Wally's contributions to this list, and always find them on target
and very helpful.  We all have different communication styles; yours may
rub other people the wrong way (I know several folks on this list who
characterize your style as "brusque")---but I'll bet I know your reaction
if someone said they wished *you* would go away: you'd resolutely stand
your ground, wouldn't you?  And so you should.  I think Wally should do the
very same.  In fact, I wish he would post more often.

Craig Smith