PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:51:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
According to my nutrition course, some research has shown that the
pasteurization process modifies the milk in such a way as to promote heart
disease.  I do not remember the details.  So it is possible that raw milk
would be okay.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paleolithic Eating Support List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Todd Moody
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 1998 1:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [P-F] beef
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Ray Audette wrote:
>
>  > In a message dated 98-07-15 07:22:03 EDT, you write:
> > > <<  Either milk,
> > >  which the Samburu make extensive use of, is not so bad, or the
> > >  Samburu represent a local adaptation.  If the latter, then their
> > >  experience with milk *and* beef cannot be generalized to the rest
> > >  of us. >>
> >
> > We are only talking about coronary health.  These people have all of the
> > other problems associated with milk consumption.  Pastoral people are
> > neolithic and not as healthy as paleolithic people.
>
> What health problems are you referring to here?  Usually it is
> precisely coronary health that is linked to milk consumption
> (e.g., by Loren Cordain), with the exception of lactose
> intolerance.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2