PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tracy Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:59:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
I don't know - I'd think if you're dead stable at 100, not having 
swings, you're doing pretty well.

Craig Miles wrote:
> Wolfgang Lutz and Christian Allan in Life Without Bread say it should
> be between 70 and 90 in normal individuals.
> Over 100 is a sign of things not being right.
>
> Regards,
> Craig.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Trish Leon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>   
>>  Fasting glucose should be between 90 and approx. 140. Right?
>>
>>
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Robert Kesterson
>> Sender: Paleolithic Eating Support List
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> ReplyTo: Paleolithic Eating Support List
>> Subject: Re: Zero Carb Paleo
>> Sent: Feb 3, 2009 8:08 PM
>>
>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:23:21 -0600, Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>     
>>> ... I would add that
>>> a fasting blood glucose level close to 100 is not, in my estimation,
>>> ideal.
>>>       
>> Just curious -- what is?  (I'm really not sure what I should be aiming for, other than "under 100"?)
>>
>> --
>>  Robert Kesterson
>>  [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>>     
>
>   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2