PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Philip Thrift <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jun 2002 20:26:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 13:31:36 -0700, David Karas <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> ... raw food seems to be nature's plan. We
>are the only species on this planet that usually eats cooked food.

We are not the only species to have cooked. Home erectus, predating our
species, cooked. Our species has been cooking thoughout its existence,
so cooked food seems to be nature's plan.



On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:35:21 -0700, Mary <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Look at nutrient values for cooked vs raw meat, raw meat retains much more
>of its nutrient value.

Not a significant amount, according to the article below from
the site previously mentiones.

And cooking may help in getting more nutrients that are there:

Looking at the Science on Raw vs. Cooked Foods

   http://www.beyondveg.com/tu-j-l/raw-cooked/raw-cooked-2f.shtml

(this is in the middle of a long article).


Philip Thrift
http://www.geocities.com/paleofitness

ATOM RSS1 RSS2