OK, I will admit that I haven't been online much in the last few days, and I don't know what William posted, but in my experience he has not ever been a PITA.  And I will tell you that *I* don't like much the the conversation about evolution, which *I* don't belive in, so I don't understand the point here.  I thought we were talking about food...




When William says things like “... my objection to evolution - that
since there is no evidence to its truth, it is necessarily
faith-based...” this sort of crack could be tolerated if it were only
occasionally posted, but when this kind of thing dominates the digest,
as it has been doing--and is also done to provoke--then for me at
least it makes the digest a pain to read. I suppose that means that I
should not read the digest.

Ken