> Well, at that time, EAS didn't have the huge line of
> supplements that it has
> now.  If you believe that Bill Phillips (or who ever
> it was that initially
> wrote about this idea) believes this idea really
> works then you truly know
> absolutely nothing about bodybuilding.

I didn't say anything about believing Phillips or the
author of the story, or whether or not the "theory"
has any validity. I merely corrected what I considered
to be a minor omission in your post.

And I probably know more about bodybuilding than you
apparently know about being civil.

> Bill used to be quite a bodybuilder
> himself.  He knows what works in the real world, and
> he also knows that this
> 2 week massing, 2 week cutting crap doesn't work -
> but he also knows that it
> sells supplements.

That may well be. I don't dispute it. But when the
article was first published, they did not use it to
"hype" their supplements. Are you suggesting that
Phillips wrote/published the article, under another
name, years before he intended to use it to promote
his supplements? If that's the case, he's is a much
more outstanding promoter than I thought.

> If he did, then the trainess were either untrained
> to begin with or they
> were doing something seriously wrong before.  Or,
> many times, the
> researchers embellish the results.

The same possibilities exist with any study, including
some I'm sure you would use to support your opinions.

> I knew more about what works and what doesn't work
> in upper echelon
> bodybuilding at the age or 13 than you will ever
> know in your entire life.

My, Justin, did we get up on the wrong side of the bed
this morning? Why the rage? I said nothing in my post
that should incite such a response from you.

> I will continue to make any judgment I damn well
> please.

No doubt.

> Perhaps you should learn a thing or 2 about
> bodybuilding before you continue
> to make judgments?

Please, enlighten me regarding which "judgements" I
made that set you off? Are you angry because I added
an additional reference to your post? Are you angry
because you think we should accept your posts as
gospel simply because you posted them? Are you just...
angry?

Methinks the man doth protest too much.