Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:53:09 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
on 15/09/00 04:37, Paula at [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>
>> I'm 5'5" and 154 as of this morning. I have a small bone frame (less than
>> 21/4 inch of wrist circumference.)
>
> Medusa,
> Is this a typo 2 1/4 inch wrist circumference? I am small framed and
> my wrist is 6 1/2 inches. By the way I am 5'5" &3/4 and weigh 150 exactly. I
> think my ideal weight would be 133. 120 sounds a little too low. Though I
> did weigh 117 in my early 20s (now 42), I probably didn't have enough muscle
> back then. I am now at the low end of my ideal lean body mass 107. If I were
> 120 now I would not have enough body fat for a female. I like having
> hormones and periods and all - helps prevent osteoporosis.
> By the way all, I had a colonoscopy today and my crohn's is in total
> remission. The Dr. said that he has never seen such complete healing before.
> Then he said "looks like the asacol is working", but I know better. It's
> definately the diet. I'm still having problems with pain in the illeum from
> an adhesion though. Anyone know how to get rid of adhesions without surgery?
> Paula
Woah, typo indeed.
53/4 inches actually, I don't know where that 21/4 came from, I'm not
a
praying mantis.
I agree that 120 may be a little low, but I have little point of
references
on what I'd look like slim, besides the time I weighed 115 but still
looked
fat (probably lost much LBM).
:Medusa:
[subvert and conquer : ProjectMayhem2000]
|
|
|