PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brenda Young <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:01:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
OK, gotcha!!!  Thanks for clearing that up!!!  

As for the appropriateness for this list...I can't address that.  I am not Paleo, I just like listening and learning from all of you guys.  I am fairly close to Paleo, but even though I'm not in the full sense of the word, there is much to be learned here.  From my less-then-knowledgeable standpoint, I thought this was an interesting discussion, whether it "belonged" here or not.  

Love,
Bren

Keith Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote: On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:54 Brenda Young wrote:

>I live in the USA, which is probably one of 
>the WORST places for honesty in food labeling, 
>thanks to the stupid FDA.  But you say that 
>unpasteurized milk would be type A2??

Not what I meant. I meant that you might be
able to find A2 milk that is ALSO unpasturized
which would be a bonus.

Peter Hummers suggests that discussion about
milk should not be on this list. That is open to
question as the time that humans became
regular milk drinkers (and thus kept mammals 
for their milk) is not known. It may be that
regular milk consumption is as non-palaeo as
regular grain consumption. That's my general
position, but we just don't really know, do we.

Keith


       
---------------------------------
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2