PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ron Hoggan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:04:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi Emiliano, 
I don't understand Creationism enough to defend or attack it. 

The theory of evolution provides better evidence against Paleo eating than
Creationism does. The whole one-diet-fits-all Paleo paradigm is easily
discredited by evolution but not Creationism. 
For instance, those who can trace their genes to the Fertile Crescent about
10,000 years ago might argue that they have had sufficient time to adapt to
wheat consumption. And they might be right. 
And those who can trace their genes back to the Massai or northwestern
Europe might argue that they are well adapted to dairy. They, too, might be
right. These exceptions follow on evolutionary theory, not Creationism.
And what about the person whose roots can be traced to sea shores? Are they
better adapted to eating seafood?

best wishes, 
Ron  

-----Original Message-----
From: Paleolithic Eating Support List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Emiliano Bussolo

 If you reject evolution you have no reason to eat paleo. 

 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2