Everyone....

Please realize that my first response to Williams first post was outrage not
because he refuted evolution, but because of the *hate language* contained
in the link he posted.  No one here should care what anyone else says about
evolution or religion etc.  I used to be a bartender and the big no no is
religion and politics.   please go back to the original post from william
and follow his link and you will see what i am talking about.  Then lets
drop this creationism/evolution thing and get back to paleolithic life and
food.


zack

p.s.  most moderators will not let ceratain language in their forums.  Does
posting a link with that much use of the "n" word and "k" word qualify as
something that is unacceptable?




On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Geoffrey Purcell
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>  I wish people wouldn't make gross generalisations/assumptions about groups
> based on the comments of just 1 or 2 individuals. I should point out that
> the vast majority of rawpalaeodieters(those pesky "raw meat and fat
> folks"(lol!)) haven't the faintest interest or even remote liking for
>  Creationism/anti-evolution arguments, and, indeed, for obvious reasons if
> you think about it, have a bigger, more vested interest than
> cooked-palaeodieters as regards  favouring the issues of evolution and
> non-adaptation to specific foods. The only people I know of, even vaguely
> remotely connected to RAF(Raw Animal Food) diets,  who are of a largely
> Creationist mindset, are the crazy WAPFers(Weston Price Foundation
> supporters) who believe, more or less, in a cooked-meat/raw-dairy/fermented
> grains diet(not exactly really raw or even palaeo, in the first place).
>
>
>
> Personally, I think religion(and politics) should be avoided completely on
> this list unless they have a particularly strong  Palaeo slant. So, for
> example, it might be barely acceptable to discuss how Palaeolithic-era
> tribal shamans would go in for eating hallucinogenic mushrooms in order to
> enhance their trances while doing those beautiful Palaeo cave-paintings in
> western Europe(OK, it's not even a solid theory, as yet, but, it's a hell of
> a lot more interesting than discussing Creationism, which, quite frankly, is
> the polar opposite  of the theory behind a Palaeolithic diet. After all, if
> we are to believe the literal word of the Bible re Bishop Usher's original
> interpreation, we, supposedly, only started existing c.4,004 BC, some 6,000
> to 14,000 years AFTER the Palaeolithic ended(depending on one's definition
> of the Palaeolithic era). So, it's either one or the other that has to be
> true. And this list is for those who believe in the Palaeo version of
> events.
>
>
>
> As regards Cordain, I've had enough experience of the archives of this
> group to know that not everyone or even the majority is a stout follower of
> Cordain, even if they still follow Palaeo ideas, in general terms. Some are
> rawpalaeodieters, some are Stefanssonite followers(ie just cooked-animal
> meat and fat), some are  low-carb/high-fat like Ray Audette(last I checked),
>  some are Cordainites, and still others sometimes even like to  indulge in
> dodgy, non-Palaeo foods like dairy or grains.   That's the trouble with the
> "Palaeo" definition, I guess, everyone has their own different POV as to
> what it "really" means.
>
>
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:12:23 -0500
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: On the tone of the digest
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > I don't know the history of this site, but the name says PALEOFOOD
> Digest.
> > Did you have that name before Cordain began publishing his work? It seems
> to
> > me that this site is dominated by a few individuals who dismiss all the
> > scientific evidence regarding the Paleo diet and evolution. What is that
> all
> > about? I suppose censorship should not take place, but somehow
> closed-minded
> > smart-ass remarks designed to provoke should not rule, as they seem to
> do.
> > Maybe the raw meat and fat folks should have their own digest, and the
> > Cordain-paleodiet people another one.
> >
> > Ken
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more!
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/