I was thinking of occasionally adding articles which had something to do with the Palaeolithic era, but not necessarily anything to do with diet. Is this OK? I mean, articles on mammoths and suchlike. For example, would this article be appropriate?:-


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html

  If this is not acceptable, would it, at least, be OK to refer to articles which are only indirectly related to palaeolithic diets, such as articles on the extraordinary strength of palaeolithic-era human bones?


Geoff