PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Weis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:49:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (CM.0402.7.09)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree with Jean-Claude on this one. Additionally, there is the issue of=

irradiating foods. In the =

book Fast Food Nation, the author makes a pretty compelling case that the=
 only
reason for =

creating the technology to irradiate foods and thereby make them safe for=

human consumption, =

is because the speeds at which the cattle are slaughtered in the meatpack=
ing
plants is so fast =

that the employees can rarely disembowel the animals properly before havi=
ng to
move on to the =

next animal.

The result is that contaminated fecal matter infects that animal and ever=
y
other animal that =

goes through that station afterwards. Irradiation appears to be a step th=
at
the meat packers =

want to add so that they can justify doing an even sloppier job on the ki=
lling
floor than they =

already do with meat that isn't healthy to begin with.

Not good for the animals. Not good for the workers and DEFINITELY not goo=
d for
consumers.

Mike =



____________________________________________________________________
   =

ATOM RSS1 RSS2