Geoffrey Purcell wrote:

  For a
> diet to be "natural", it must be beneficial to humans. Yet, 1000s of
> studies have shown direct links between the amounts of hat-created
> toxins in foods eaten by humans and a higher incidence of
> cancer/diabetes and numerous age- related illnesses. Since, clearly,
> cooked foods do harm humans(with greater harm done as the cooking
> temperature increases), it is quite safe to state that humans are not
> fully adapted to cooked foods, and that cooked foods are not natural.
> 
> 

It follows that the critical point is whether such illnesses leave marks 
on bones, as we are told that paleolithic bones show no such marks.

IIRC  this is the field of forensic pathology, does anyone know?

William