PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wally Day <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 01:37:25 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I appreciate all of the input regarding this subject, but let me steer it
back to it's original track a bit.

The gentleman I was arguing with insisted that all of the "bad"
reports/studies about milk - including high incidence of lactose
intolerance - are because the milk used/tested was not raw, but
pasteurized.

My question is this - are all of the studies regarding the harmful effects
of milk based on pasteurized (cooked) milk? Or, have any studies been done
on raw milk?

(Please do not answer that it does not matter because his point was that it
matters very much).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2