PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:35:05 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (12 lines)
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Swayze wrote:
> Again, once
> the fish has met that caloric threshold, other considerations than caloric
> density come into play.

Okay, that makes sense.  Now how does that translate into support
for the claim that sweet potatoes or other tubers would have been
a marginal (i.e., non-preferred) food?

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2