Hilary McClure wrote:
> william wrote:
>> 
>> Am I the only one here who has heard of the "Missing Link"?
> 
> Of course, everyone here has heard the term "Missing Link". But
> William, I'm wondering what you mean by "the". Which missing link are
> you referring to?

I leave such a definition to those specialists who know what they are 
looking at. I can't; AFAIK no one has "shown" such.


  It is a very solid theory
> (*not* a hypothesis). Of course, it's not "proven". As others have
> pointed out, science doesn't prove things true. 


Yes, the scientific reports I've read never use the word "proven", but 
they do use the word "show", which I take to mean that a competent and 
skeptical observer can see the truth of their finding.

I've read that the scientific process requires examination and criticism 
of every theory, otherwise we would have a (multi-billion $) cold fusion 
project.
I'm not satisfied that this has been properly done for evolution of man.

Still waiting for an answer - what has evolution to do with paleofood?

William