> i was very disappointed in how the WW mag article turned out.

Typical.  Maybe instead of just talking to her, you should have basically
written the article for her.  Journalists in general aren't that bright, and are
very ideological.  And I think the journalists working for women's magazine are
especially dull.

Anyway, that the work is leaking out, even in a convoluted inaccurate way, is a
good sign.