I struggle with this one.  We're all offended because we all agree with
him.  But, what about the person with no formal qualifications who
convincingly advocates a Coca-Cola & potato diet?  Should he be allowed to
offer this advice?  Should he have to produce research supporting what he's
saying?  Who evaluates that research?

There are good reasons for restrict who can run electricity through your
house or design bridges.  How is this different?

I don't know what the solution is, but I do think he's crossing a line when
he starts making recommendations to other people rather than limiting
himself to "This is what works for me."

Donovan

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:56 PM, June Kamerling
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Thank you for this Larry T. I saw it last week on Facebook. Really
> interesting and
> maddening. I'm interested to know the outcome.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Lawrence Tagrin <[log in to unmask]
> >wrote:
>
> > I usually don't agree with George Will, but occasionally he offers
> > something of value.  His Washington Post column from the other day struck
> > me as worth reading.
> >
> > http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will092712.php3
> >
> > Larry-T
> >
> > --
> > Keep the books,
> > Burn the censors
> > ---------------------------
> > Ignore Faux News
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *June Kamerling
> Pilates, personal trainer, massage therapist*
> *El Cerrito Fitness Pilates and Personal Training*
> *10833 San Pablo Avenue*
> *El Cerrito, CA 94530*
> *510-604-5732*
> *www.elcerritofitness.com* <http://www.elcerritofitness.com/>
> *Check us out on Facebook...*
>