At 12:16 PM 02/05/2001 -0500, you wrote:
......
>*If* the infecting agency was already present.....
>
>The W.Price article was from a farmer in England, wasn't it? How many cattle
>have it already in them, in England?
>And how many in Germany (now we have 100 BSE cattle, GB had 180000)?
>It's just if Germans start to test something, they test it thoroughly.
>Now the misery just shows up, probably it was present for long.
>To me it looks like that whole BSE was already present for a long time.
>Farmers told such mad cows were always found in history, just very seldom.
>Now's chain reaction.
>
>Amadeus S.

        Now there's a disease to treat.

Dave

        and from www.planetchiropractic.com:

Planet Chiropractic NewsTuesday, February 06, 2001
Unvaccinated Children & Philosophical Exemptions - GCN-NEWS@9:10 am PST
comments
(0)
Forwarded by PROVE
In the December 27th issue the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical
Association), some doctors and CDC cronies published a study proclaiming the
astounding finding that unvaccinated children are more at risk for measles and
pertussis than vaccinated children. (Abstract available by clicking here.)
They went on to claim that "exemptors" put the public at risk because 11% of
those who got the measles got them from an "exemptor". Think about that
statement and do the math for yourself - if 11% of the cases were contracted
from an "exemptor, that means 89% were contracted from someone who was
vaccinated! It seems like the study really showed that the vaccine didn't work
very well when actually put to the test of having to protect someone.
Phyllis Schlafly, president of the Eagle Forum, just wrote a fantastic column
responding to this so called study, and I thought it was well worth passing on.
It supports the right of parents to conscientious/philosophical exemptions for
their children.
From the article...
So why do ACIP and FDA so gratuitously recommend so many vaccines for all
children? JAMA's editorial reveals the answer: these recommendations are
monetary decisions masquerading as medical decisions.
Here are JAMA's words: "Since federal funding for vaccines is determined by the
ACIP through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program, whenever possible the
ACIP should endorse funding for vaccines that physicians and parents wish to
administer." In other words, the real purpose of ACIP and FDA recommendations
is to release federal funds to buy the vaccines from the manufacturers.
Cui Bono in Vaccine Mandate