>****There is a great flaw here if  the numbers were intended
>to be  0.6 and 0.3  respectively!  As  no honest scientist
>would use    blank dot six;   or blank dot 3 to represent
>0.3 and 0.6!   so you may see how easily you may be taken in
>by garbage science,  some reporter has repeated the data to
>support her agenda!....

  The difference between  78
>and 77.65 is  ZERO!    As in science we use the same degree
>of difference.  Therefore  the numbers are rigged!   Most
>probably to support the agenda of the reporter!   ...

>So  you see how easy the political lie is presented to us.
>And if we are not numerically aware we may be misled by this
>type of manipulation!
>
>Finally the writer who blessed us with this astonishing
>information failed to mention that these differences are
>most probably too small to be of any use!

what kind of agenda, do you think,  led those peoples to fool themselves or
others?


jean-claude