> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Moody [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 8:31 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [P-F] "challenges" to evolution theory
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
> > "by natural processes -- a necessary assumption if we wish to
> > remain within the realm of science --".
> >
> > What is the natural law of Intelligent Design ? Seems super-natural
> > to me.
>
> That's peculiar.  Both SETI and archeology are scientific
> searches for intelligent design.  Are they also about the
> supernatural?
>
> One of the differences between Intelligent Design and creationism
> is that ID theory makes no assumptions about the identity or
> character of the designer.  If intelligent design falls outside
> the range of science, then SETI and archeology are not science.

This seems to lead to the question: Who designed the designers?

The claim that the designers were not supernatural seems to be
a cover for creationists.