> I see it the opposite way - we have not evolved to eat anything other than 
> what our paleolithic ancestors ate.

> So there has been no evolution for ~100,000 years, and before that there's 
> no evidence, no proof, just speculation.

Of what relevance is it to us what our "paleolithic ancestors" ate, if you 
think there is no evolution (in other words, according to you, we wouldn't 
have paleolithic ancestors)?  So who are these "paleolithic ancestors" that 
you mention above? How do you see them being connected to us?

Marilyn