In a message dated 3/22/2001 4:00:42 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> Considering the general  mental state of a person developping symtoms. i
> will say that medical intervention at first thru its emotionnal or spiritual
> "hope giving" effect , will postpone the outcome in  the physical realm.
> then the hard physical reality of medical intervention take its toll and
> precipate you at the end of the no exit and finish you.
> fondamentally and philosophically,  i will say that medical intervention "
> DO NOTHNG" ( Like many human activities ) just playing with the dimensions
> of time and space ( displacing around  their relationship).
> A real "'DO NOTHNG ATTITUDE " will be the least stressfull acceptance of
> WHAT Is.
> In other words, : conditions being what they are , necessary outcomes have
> to be experienced .
> If you  don't like the outcomes change the conditions.
> The cause of medical intervention is human irresponsibility experienced as
> guilt.
> The experience of guilt  1 ask  for a savior 2  expect a  punishement .
> with medical intervention you got both and both way between the 2 parties
> ( both sides experience at time the guilt of this unloving relationship and
> project it on the other side )
> Did i succeed at making somebody angry? a doctor? a patient? ( with a smile)
> jean-claude
>
> I agree with jean-claude!