PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rob Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Aug 2003 18:42:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> > What type of tuna? In a NY Times article a couple weeks back they
pointed
> > out that albacore tuna (sold as white tuna) has more mercury than light
> > tuna, which comes from smaller fish. In the white it was 0.5 parts per
> > million. and in light it was 0.13.
>
> That would pretty-much confirm something I read, somewhere...the larger
the
> fish, the longer it has been exposed to mercury in the ocean.

Yes.  Larger, predatory fish have lived longer and bioaccululated more
mercury from their prey.  Mercury is uniformly distributed throughout the
organs and flesh in fish; whereas organic contaminants (like PCBs) and
preferentially stored in fat in fish.

Rob

ATOM RSS1 RSS2