PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"John C. Pavao" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Dec 1997 09:01:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
In my layperson's opinion, I'd mostly agree.  Except that you don't drink
coffee on Neanderthin, remember?

Seriously, it's pretty unlikely that people ate honey with any frequency
10,000+ years ago, so technically it's probably almost on par with refined
sugar in that the body is no more prepared to deal with one than the other.
 It's a matter of judgement.  I don't think someone like me who has weight
to lose should be messing around with it.

John Pavao

----------
        So, all in all, honey is the best of the worse as far as sugar and
sugar substitues go.  It's not some weird chemical manufactured by Dow
Corning.  And it's not Refined White Sugar.  It's not good for you, but it
is the least bad of the bad things you could put in your coffee.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2