Enforce?  Let's start by NOT forcing women to have unwanted children.
We can start by making birth control EASILY AVAILIABLE to every women
and man on earth.  And by ending the social stigmas on both abortion and
the use of birth control.  And there is the further improvement that
breast-feeding children for the natural (h/g) amount of time would have
on spacing children.  Before we think about enforcing birth control, we
should think about simply making it availiable to those who would use it
if it were.

Erik Hill

Michael Audette wrote:
>
>   Birth control may be a better answer, although hard to enforce.
>
> `
> [log in to unmask]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paleolithic Eating Support List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Wally Day
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 5:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [P-F] Speaking of fish....
>
> The life expectancy issue is an interesting one. Why
> don't the statisticians also quote a "normal" life
> expectancy - one which excludes infant fatalities and
> accidental deaths? In other words, take all of the
> deaths considered attributable to "natural causes" and
> come up with some kind of median value? *That* would
> be a much more useful number in my thinking.
>
> Now, on to fish. I think it's unlikely that a large
> percentage of the population would ever go paleo, but
> I can't help but wonder how they could all be fed if
> it did happen. I doubt very much if we could feed them
> all using range fed animals, so it would seem the
> likely protein source would have to be fish. I wonder:
> What kind of impact would replacing land animal foods
> with seafoods have on the health of each individual?
> Is it possible to "farm" fish without resorting to
> feeding them grains? Or, is it possible to get enough
> food directly from the ocean to feed that many people?
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
> Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com