I take offense to that "creationist rubbish" remark.  I am a Christian, and I know many of you are not.  I have never been offensive to anyone here about your beliefs, (although I disagree with some of them), nor do I appreciate someone of another belief basically calling me a moron.  
 
Were it not for "pseudo science", ie bullshit drugs and non-food, to name just two lovely things derived from your apparently esteemed and fail-proof practice, and the propaganda hammered upon us by the same, none of us would have to worry about eating Paleo and risking the mockery of most of the rest of the world, because it would still be the "norm".  So, while I don't particularly wish to partake in this debate, I would say that some need to remember that "science" is full of BS more often than not, and can be slanted toward anyone's beliefs/research project (or stockholders) just as well as a religious outlook can.  
 
Just because the Paleo "back-science" and my beliefs do not necessarily always coincide, does not mean that I do not wholeheartedly agree with this way of eating.  Why do we need to agree upon the particulars of the "origins" when it just makes plain ol' sense to eat this way??  
 
Love,
Bren, the resident moron

 
>
I heartily agree. Creationist rubbish has no place here on a palaeolithic diet forum,  given that we rely here  on an emphasis on scientific evidence, rather than on quasi-Velikovskian Biblical references and other Von-Daenikenesque-nonsense.

Geoff
>