This is why I make the point that it doesn't *matter* whether  
evolution is true.  We are to imitate man's preagricultural diet since  
we are still that man.

For the record, I am very much a believing Christian and think the  
evidence is pretty strong humans did indeed evolve.  There's no  
conflict between the biblical creation and evolution.

Jim Swayze
www.fireholecanyon.com
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 24, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Lynnet Bannion <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:43:02 -0600, william <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>> Me too. If we have evolved, then the food of
>> paleoman should not be considered suitable for us.
> The whole point of paleo eating is that we have *not* evolved  
> significantly from paleoman.
> Paleoman is anybody living before the advent of agriculture.  10,000  
> years (or 2,000 for
> parts of Europe, or 200 for some indigenous peoples) is not very  
> long evolutionarily speaking. You could clean up and dress up a Cro- 
> Magnon and send him out on the city streets and nobody would notice  
> any difference. (Except the Cro-Magnon of course, who would be  
> stunned if not horrified by how we live.)
>
> But paleoman shows clear signs of having evolved from earlier  
> hominins, and other mammals before that.  There is a fairly complete  
> fossil record of pre-modern humans, unless you have religious  
> reasons for not believing it. But we're talking 1.5 to 2 million  
> years ago.
>
>    Lynnet