Yes. I think that's entirely appropriate.  Thanks for that!

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Hanni Wienkoop
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> 1.3.2012 7:03, Geoffrey Purcell kirjoitti:
>
>  I was thinking of occasionally adding articles which had something to do
>> with the Palaeolithic era, but not necessarily anything to do with diet. Is
>> this OK? I mean, articles on mammoths and suchlike. For example, would this
>> article be appropriate?:-
>>
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/**news/newstopics/howaboutthat/**
>> 9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-**were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-**
>> North-America.html<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html>
>>
>>   If this is not acceptable, would it, at least, be OK to refer to
>> articles which are only indirectly related to palaeolithic diets, such as
>> articles on the extraordinary strength of palaeolithic-era human bones?
>>
>>
>> Geoff
>>
>   Yes please, a nice idea.
>
> Hanni
>